(Optional Memorial for Saint John of Capistrano, Priest)
“The Last Judgment” by Lucas van Leyden, 1526 |
Commentary:
Reading 1: Romans 7:18-25a
Commentary on Rom 7:18-25a
St. Paul continues he existential apology about over-dependence on the letter of the Law: “…persons who do not experience the justifying grace of God, and Christians who revert to dependence on law as the criterion for their relationship with God, will recognize a rift between their reasoned desire for the goodness of the law and their actual performance that is contrary to the law. Unable to free themselves from the slavery of sin and the power of death, they can only be rescued from defeat in the conflict by the power of God's grace working through Jesus Christ.”[4]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Responsorial Psalm: Psalm 119:66, 68, 76, 77, 93, 94
R. (68b) Lord, teach me your statutes.
Commentary on Ps 119:66, 68, 76, 77, 93, 94
In ironic counterpoint to St. Paul’s discourse about the need to be dependent upon the spirit rather than the letter of the law (Romans 7:18-25a), this passage from Psalm 119 give thanks for the Law and rejoices in its structure as a saving grace.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gospel: Luke 12:54-59
Commentary on: Lk 12:54-59
The Lord continues his reflection on the end times (the Parousia) and, using the analogy of seeing what weather will come based upon the direction of the wind, he asks if they cannot see the signs of the coming of the Kingdom of God . Applying the image of an impending court date at which a judge will pass a sentence, he urges the people to reconcile themselves with the Lord. Using that urgency generated by the uncertainty of the hour of that call to judgment, he exhorts the crowd to order their lives now and do not delay.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reflection:
For us, however, we look at a much more practical application of that same kind of logic. As Christians we are defined by the language and logic of Christ. The concepts he taught go against modern norms surrounding some important concepts. Let’s take the Lord’s definition of leadership for example. In his day, political leaders ruled with an iron fist. There was no democracy, no benevolent governance. There were rules and armies to enforce those rules and the leaders lived in lavish comfort, usually having attained their posts through ruthless dealings with their competitors.
Christ taught his disciples to lead through service telling them that the greatest among them would be the servant of the rest. This is a complete inversion of the view of leadership in his day (and to a large degree, ours).
Let’s also look at how the Lord defines victory or success. It is not as the world counts success. His victory was the Baptism of his passion. It is his great suffering, sacrifice and ultimate crucifixion that marked his victory. By the standards of his day (and ours) that would have seemed a defeat, but in dying he destroyed death for those who love him and fulfilled the plan God had set in motion from the beginning of time.
Pax
[2] The picture is “The Last Judgment” by Lucas van Leyden, 1526
[4] See NAB footnote on Romans 7:18ff
No comments:
Post a Comment